For those who have a web site as well as an app, pace is essential. The swifter your site functions and then the speedier your web apps function, the better for you. Considering that a site is simply a collection of data files that communicate with each other, the devices that keep and access these data files play an important role in site performance.

Hard disks, or HDDs, have been, until the past few years, the most efficient devices for storing data. Nevertheless, in recent years solid–state drives, or SSDs, are actually gathering popularity. Have a look at our comparison chart to find out whether HDDs or SSDs are more effective for you.

1. Access Time

Image

With the arrival of SSD drives, file access rates have gone tremendous. Thanks to the brand new electronic interfaces employed in SSD drives, the standard file access time has been reduced to a all–time low of 0.1millisecond.

Image

HDD drives rely on spinning disks for files storage uses. Each time a file is being accessed, you have to wait for the appropriate disk to reach the appropriate place for the laser beam to view the file involved. This ends in a typical access speed of 5 to 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

The random I/O performance is extremely important for the functionality of any data file storage device. We’ve carried out detailed testing and have established an SSD can handle at the least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

With an HDD drive, the I/O performance gradually improves the more you use the disk drive. Even so, as soon as it gets to a particular limit, it can’t go swifter. And because of the now–old technology, that I/O limit is a lot below what you can have having an SSD.

HDD can only go so far as 400 IO’s per second.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives don’t have just about any moving parts, which means that there is a lesser amount of machinery included. And the fewer physically moving elements you will find, the lower the prospect of failure will be.

The regular rate of failure of an SSD drive is 0.5%.

Image

Since we already have mentioned, HDD drives use spinning disks. And something that employs numerous moving parts for prolonged time frames is more prone to failure.

HDD drives’ average rate of failing ranges somewhere between 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSD drives are usually smaller than HDD drives as well as they don’t possess just about any moving components whatsoever. As a result they don’t create so much heat and need less energy to function and much less energy for cooling down purposes.

SSDs take in amongst 2 and 5 watts.

Image

From the moment they have been made, HDDs have always been very electrical power–hungry systems. And when you’ve got a web server with many different HDD drives, this can add to the month–to–month electricity bill.

Normally, HDDs consume in between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

Because of SSD drives’ higher I/O functionality, the leading server CPU will be able to work with file calls faster and save time for other procedures.

The regular I/O delay for SSD drives is 1%.

Image

If you use an HDD, you have to spend additional time looking forward to the results of your data file query. This means that the CPU will stay idle for extra time, looking forward to the HDD to react.

The standard I/O delay for HDD drives is approximately 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

In real life, SSDs conduct as perfectly as they have in the course of our tests. We ran a full platform back–up using one of our own production servers. Over the backup procedure, the common service time for any I/O calls was under 20 ms.

Image

Throughout the identical lab tests with the exact same hosting server, this time around suited out with HDDs, general performance was noticeably sluggish. All through the server back–up procedure, the average service time for any I/O demands fluctuated somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

You can easily check out the real–world benefits of having SSD drives every single day. As an example, with a web server equipped with SSD drives, a full back–up is going to take only 6 hours.

Image

In contrast, on a hosting server with HDD drives, the same backup normally takes three to four times as long to complete. An entire backup of an HDD–powered web server may take 20 to 24 hours.

Should you want to automatically raise the efficiency of your respective web sites and not have to modify just about any code, an SSD–powered website hosting service will be a excellent solution. Examine our shared hosting packages plus the Linux VPS hosting services – these hosting services offer really fast SSD drives and can be found at the best prices.


  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Each of our Virtual Private Servers is setup for you cost–free. 99.9% network uptime. Full root server access rights.
  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Examine the resources and characteristics coming with wCloud’s Virtual Private Servers. You could begin with a cheaper VPS Hosting configuration and upgrade with just a mouse click as your necessities increase.
  • Compare our hosting plans
  • Contact Us

  •  
  • Our representatives are online for you 24 hours to reply to any sort of queries about our VPS Hosting services. 1–hour reply–back time frame guarantee.